Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
John W. SHEDRICK, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. ASPLUNDH TREE EXPERT CO., et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, III, J.), entered January 21, 2000, which denied defendants' motion to change the venue of this action to Suffolk County, unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, without costs, and the motion granted.
CPLR 510(3) provides for a discretionary change of venue where “the convenience of material witnesses and the ends of justice will be promoted by the change.” (See, Boral v. Clarkson Univ., 270 A.D.2d 776, 706 N.Y.S.2d 360; O'Brien v. Vassar Bros. Hosp., 207 A.D.2d 169, 622 N.Y.S.2d 284).
In the matter before us, it is undisputed that the accident, which involved a car owned by plaintiff Jeannette W. Shedrick and operated by plaintiff John W. Shedrick with a truck owned by defendant Asplundh Tree Expert Co. and driven by defendant Richard W. Ellersohn, occurred in Brentwood, Suffolk County; that plaintiffs and Ellersohn reside in Suffolk County; that plaintiffs were treated at hospitals in that County; that the Suffolk County Police Department responded to and investigated the accident; and that plaintiffs' treating physicians, physical therapists and other, delineated potential expert witnesses all maintain Suffolk County addresses. Indeed, the only connection whatsoever that this action has with New York County is that Asplundh, a Pennsylvania corporation, designated a New York County address with the Secretary of State for the purpose of service of process. We, therefore, conclude that the convenience of the witnesses would best be served but that the balance of factors weighs heavily in favor of placing this action in Suffolk County and that the motion court improvidently exercised its discretion when it denied defendants' motion (Lloyd v. National Propane Corp., 271 A.D.2d 202, 706 N.Y.S.2d 34; Neos v. Crabby Joe's, Inc., 241 A.D.2d 337, 659 N.Y.S.2d 31).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: December 12, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)