Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Carmen TANCREDI, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgments, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered August 23, 2006, convicting defendant, upon her pleas of guilty, of two counts of criminal contempt in the first degree, and sentencing her to concurrent terms of 1 1/313 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed. Order, same court and Justice, entered on or about October 24, 2006, which denied defendant's CPL 440.10 and 440.20 motions to vacate the judgments and set aside the sentences, unanimously affirmed.
A condition of defendant's guilty pleas was that she agreed to purchase a one-way ticket to Spain by the time of sentencing, thereby indicating that she would be leaving the United States. The court warned defendant that, if she contacted the victim prior to sentencing she would “face up to eight years,” and that any failure on her part to “work something out” with the immigration authorities would not be a ground for withdrawing her pleas. The record demonstrates that she proposed the condition of leaving the country as a method of avoiding incarceration; and that if she violated the condition relating to buying a ticket to Spain, she would receive the enhanced sentence. Defendant appeared for sentencing without the required plane ticket, repudiated the agreement to leave the country and instead made a plea withdrawal motion, raising a series of meritless issues. The court denied the motion and imposed an enhanced sentence. We find no basis for overturning that sentence or refusal to vacate the plea.
Defendant's remaining challenges to her pleas are without merit.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: June 12, 2008
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)