Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: DEBBONY OCTAVIA M., A Child Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. Lisa M., Respondent-Appellant, Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York, Petitioner-Respondent, Harold E. Jones, Law Guardian-Respondent.
Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Alma Cordova, J.), entered May 7, 1997, which, upon a finding of permanent neglect, terminated respondent mother's parental rights to the subject child and committed custody and guardianship of the child to petitioner Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Family Court properly admitted into evidence those portions of the case file and progress notes considered by the court in making its determination, since the contents of the admitted documents were not offered for the truth of matter as to respondent-appellant's domicile, but only to demonstrate that petitioner agency had diligently attempted to locate respondent (see generally, Matter of Bergstein v. Bd. of Educ., 34 N.Y.2d 318, 323-324, 357 N.Y.S.2d 465, 313 N.E.2d 767; Splawn v. Lextaj Corp., 197 A.D.2d 479, 480, 603 N.Y.S.2d 41), and, in light of the evidence of the agency's attempts to locate respondent, the court properly concluded that the agency had been sufficiently diligent in encouraging the parent-child relationship to satisfy the statutory mandate, the success of its efforts having been frustrated not by their inadequacy but by respondent's unresponsiveness (see, Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 N.Y.2d 136, 144, 481 N.Y.S.2d 26, 470 N.E.2d 824).
The typographical error in the petition, indicating the wrong date on which the subject child came into the care of the agency, a date significantly before her birth, did not constitute a jurisdictional defect. Respondent, moreover, was fully aware of the error and was informed of the correct date prior to the fact-finding hearing.
We have examined respondent-appellant's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: November 28, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)