Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Sherain BRYANT, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph Fisch, J.), rendered June 13, 1996, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of murder in the second degree, and sentencing her to a term of 25 years to life, unanimously affirmed.
The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the defense application to call an expert witness on battered women's syndrome on the ground that, under all the circumstances, defendant did not lay a sufficient foundation (see, People v. Cronin, 60 N.Y.2d 430, 470 N.Y.S.2d 110, 458 N.E.2d 351; People v. Diaz, 51 N.Y.2d 841, 433 N.Y.S.2d 751, 413 N.E.2d 1166) or make an adequate offer of proof. We note that there was overwhelming evidence that defendant personally inflicted vicious abuse and severe injuries upon the deceased, her four-year-old child, entirely of her own volition and ill-will toward the child, and that the purported abuser, defendant's husband, was not even present during some of this abuse. The People's theory that defendant failed to protect the child from abuse by defendant's husband was only a minor component of the case.
The court's participation in the examination of witnesses was within reasonable limits and did not deprive defendant of a fair trial (see, People v. Moulton, 43 N.Y.2d 944, 403 N.Y.S.2d 892, 374 N.E.2d 1243; People v. Gonzalez, 228 A.D.2d 340, 644 N.Y.S.2d 710, lv. denied 88 N.Y.2d 1021, 651 N.Y.S.2d 20, 673 N.E.2d 1247). Defendant's challenges to the court's charge do not warrant reversal since the charge as a whole conveyed the proper standards (see, People v. Coleman, 70 N.Y.2d 817, 523 N.Y.S.2d 433, 517 N.E.2d 1319).
We perceive no basis for reduction of sentence. The court's Biblical reference during sentence does not establish that sentencing was based on improper criteria.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 05, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)