Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: DONOVAN B., A Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant. Presentment Agency.
Order of disposition, Family Court, Bronx County (Myrna Martinez-Perez, J.), entered on or about January 19, 1999, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that appellant committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of riot in the second degree and unlawful assembly, and placed him in the custody of the New York State Division for Youth for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The court's finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The evidence established the requisite element of acting in concert with at least four other persons (Penal Law §§ 240.05, 240.10). Testimony that appellant, who was wearing blue clothing associated with the “Crips” gang, was engaged in a punching and kicking fight with an individual wearing red, associated with the “Bloods” gang, in extremely close spatial and temporal proximity to a battle between large groups of “Crips” and “Bloods”, warranted the reasonable inference that defendant was a participant in the gang fight.
The court correctly found that a statement by appellant was part of the res gestae and was not a custodial statement requiring statutory notice. Appellant did not challenge the court's interpretation of a police officer's testimony as signifying that appellant made this statement in the course of the criminal acts.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: December 14, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)