Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Carol A. DAVIS and Franklin Davis, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TED'S JUMBO RED HOTS, INC., Spiro Liaros and Peter R. Elia, Defendants-Respondents.
Plaintiffs commenced this action seeking damages for injuries sustained by plaintiff Carol A. Davis when she allegedly tripped and fell while walking across the driveway of defendant Ted's Jumbo Red Hots, Inc. Supreme Court erred in granting defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Although defendants met their initial burden on the motion, plaintiffs raised an issue of fact whether the allegedly dangerous condition of the driveway arose from defendants' use of the driveway (see generally, Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 562, 427 N.Y.S.2d 595, 404 N.E.2d 718).
Order unanimously reversed on the law with costs, motion denied and complaint reinstated.
MEMORANDUM:
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 27, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)