Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Harold D'O. BAKER, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. William R. KOHLER, et al., Defendants, Paul Mishkin, et al., Defendants-Appellants.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Robert Lippmann, J.), entered March 27, 2002, which granted plaintiffs' motion to preclude defendant Paul Mishkin from appearing as counsel on behalf of appellants, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Inasmuch as defendant Mishkin, an attorney, has already been called as a witness at trial and is likely to testify again, he was properly precluded from undertaking, in mid-trial, to represent appellants by the expedient of having himself designated “of counsel” to the law firm acting as appellants' counsel (see Feygin v. Martell, 283 A.D.2d 304, 305, 724 N.Y.S.2d 614; Zweig v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Am., 125 A.D.2d 205, 206-207, 509 N.Y.S.2d 320; see also Chang v. Chang, 190 A.D.2d 311, 318, 597 N.Y.S.2d 692).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 17, 2002
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)