IN RE: DAVID A.A. (2007)

 Family Court erred in granting petitioner's motion for a default order awarding sole legal custody of the parties' child to petitioner.   Respondent's failure to appear at the hearing on the petition does not automatically constitute a default (see Matter of Shemeco D., 265 A.D.2d 860, 695 N.Y.S.2d 799;  Matter of Kwasi S., 221 A.D.2d 1029, 634 N.Y.S.2d 579), particularly “where, as here, respondent[ ] did appear by [her] assigned counsel who objected to petitioner's default motion and who, given the opportunity, could have proceeded to a hearing and defended [her] absent client [ ]” (Matter of Cassandra M., 260 A.D.2d 961, 963, 689 N.Y.S.2d 279).   Moreover, “[u]nless there is sufficient evidence before the court to enable it to undertake a comprehensive independent review of the child[ ]'s best interests ․, a determination of a custody matter should only be made after a full evidentiary hearing” (Miller-Glass v. Glass, 237 A.D.2d 723, 724, 653 N.Y.S.2d 982). The record does not contain sufficient evidence supporting the award of sole legal custody to petitioner.   We therefore reverse the order, deny petitioner's motion and remit the matter to Family Court for a hearing on the petition.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously reversed on the law without costs, petitioner's motion is denied and the matter is remitted to Family Court, Livingston County, for a hearing on the petition.

MEMORANDUM: