Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Darlington AMADASU, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BRONX LEBANON HOSPITAL CENTER, INC., Defendant, Margaret Rosenberg, Defendant-Respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered May 7, 2003, which, in this action for breach of contract and wrongful termination, granted defendant-respondent's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against her and denied plaintiff's cross motion to compel further discovery, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to plaintiff's contention, the hospital defendants were under no obligation to renew his medical residency contract. The contract plainly provided that it was for a one-year term and was renewable only by mutual written agreement. Accordingly, defendant-respondent, plaintiff's residency supervisor, did not breach the contract when she informed plaintiff that his contract would not be renewed. Nor does plaintiff's subsequent termination from the residency training program prior to the expiration of his contract furnish grounds for a wrongful termination claim. His termination, based on his inappropriate and unprofessional treatment of a 13-year-old female patient during an unauthorized pelvic examination, was neither arbitrary nor capricious (see Meller v. Tancer, 174 A.D.2d 374, 375, 571 N.Y.S.2d 214 [1991] ) and was clearly in accordance with the residency contract pursuant to which termination of a resident was authorized for behavior deleterious to the Hospital or the Hospital's patients (see Roth v. Beth Israel Med. Ctr., 180 A.D.2d 434, 435, 579 N.Y.S.2d 373 [1992] ).
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: September 28, 2004
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)