Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Diego LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Brenda Soloff, J.), rendered February 16, 1999, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 7 years to life, and order, same court and Justice, entered on or about September 8, 2000, which summarily denied defendant's motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate the judgment of conviction, unanimously affirmed.
There were no factual issues warranting a hearing on defendant's motion to vacate judgment (see, People v. Satterfield, 66 N.Y.2d 796, 497 N.Y.S.2d 903, 488 N.E.2d 834; People v. Dominguez, 257 A.D.2d 511, 685 N.Y.S.2d 14, lv. denied 93 N.Y.2d 872, 689 N.Y.S.2d 434, 711 N.E.2d 648). The record before the motion court clearly established that the People rejected defendant's proposed cooperation agreement solely because defendant was on lifetime parole as the result of a previous conviction of second-degree possession and sentence of 4 years to life, and that any misconduct or misstatements by defendant's original attorney had no impact on the disposition of the case. Moreover, defendant forfeited his claim of ineffective assistance by his original attorney when his new attorney, who was aware of the actions of the first attorney, competently advised defendant to plead guilty nonetheless (see, People v. Petgen, 55 N.Y.2d 529, 532, 534-535, 450 N.Y.S.2d 299, 435 N.E.2d 669).
We perceive no basis for reduction of sentence.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: December 13, 2001
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)