Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Lannette ALLEN, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Babert V. BROOKS, et al., Defendants-Appellants. [And a Third Party Action].
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Stanley Green, J.), entered on or about August 14, 1996, which denied defendants' motion for summary judgment, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted and the complaint dismissed. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of the defendants-appellants dismissing the complaint.
Plaintiff worked for the third-party defendant Goodwill Industries, which leased offices on the eighth floor of the building owned and maintained by defendants. She allegedly slipped on some water as she walked past a drinking fountain in the hallway, sustaining various injuries.
The IAS court erred in denying summary judgment since there was no showing that the defendants had actual or constructive notice of the accumulation of water on which plaintiff fell. Plaintiff asserted that she had seen water at the fountain before and claimed that the water stream had been misdirected for about a month before the accident. However, she had never notified defendants. Defendants' maintenance engineer also testified he observed “drops” of water just as one would “around any water fountain,” “but not so much.”
The plaintiff may establish constructive notice by evidence that an ongoing and dangerous condition existed in the area of the accident that was routinely left unaddressed (O'Connor-Miele v. Barhite & Holzinger, 234 A.D.2d 106, 107, 650 N.Y.S.2d 717). However, in a case involving a slip and fall on liquid accumulated on a terrazzo stair, the Court of Appeals noted that the mere “ ‘general awareness' that a dangerous condition may be present is legally insufficient to constitute notice of the particular condition that caused plaintiff's fall ․ [and] liability could be predicated only on failure of defendants to remedy the danger presented by the liquid after actual or constructive notice of the condition.” (Piacquadio v. Recine Realty Corp., 84 N.Y.2d 967, 969, 622 N.Y.S.2d 493, 646 N.E.2d 795 [citations omitted]; see also Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History, 67 N.Y.2d 836, 501 N.Y.S.2d 646, 492 N.E.2d 774). There was no showing that the defendants had actual or constructive notice of the allegedly hazardous condition at the water fountain that caused plaintiff to slip and fall, and thus we dismiss the complaint.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 22, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)