Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Custody, etc., BRITTANY MONIQUE W., A Dependent Child Under Eighteen Years of Age, etc., Monique D., Respondent-Appellant, Catholic Home Bureau, Petitioner-Respondent.
Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Leah Marks, J.), entered on or about April 29, 1996, insofar as appealed from, terminating respondent-appellant's parental rights upon a finding of permanent neglect, and committing custody and guardianship of the subject child to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of social Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Clear and convincing evidence demonstrates that on numerous occasions petitioner agency helped respondent obtain suitable housing, but that respondent never remained in such housing long enough to establish a suitable and stable environment to which the child could be released, and that petitioner also attempted to refer respondent to various programs that might have helped her extricate herself from her violent relationship with the child's father, but that respondent consistently either refused the referrals or left the programs. Only after respondent's visitation rights had been terminated did she make some strides toward rehabilitation, but, on balance, those efforts are insufficient to instill “confidence of future success in reuniting the family” (Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 N.Y.2d 136, 147, 481 N.Y.S.2d 26, 470 N.E.2d 824). A preponderance of the evidence supports Family Court's finding that the child's best interests require that she be freed for adoption (see, id., at 148, 481 N.Y.S.2d 26, 470 N.E.2d 824; Matter of Amanda R., 215 A.D.2d 220, 220-221, 626 N.Y.S.2d 481, lv. denied 86 N.Y.2d 705, 632 N.Y.S.2d 499, 656 N.E.2d 598).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: February 03, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)