Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Malcolm DRIVER, Defendant-Appellant.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Andrias, J., on speedy trial motion; Budd Goodman, J., at jury trial and sentence), rendered April 27, 1995, convicting defendant of robbery in the second degree and grand larceny in the fourth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to concurrent terms of 7 1/2 to 15 years and 2 to 4 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There was ample evidence supporting the physical injury element of the second-degree robbery, including testimony that the victim sustained a bruised, swollen, and aching jaw, and had one to two inch welts on either side of his Adam's apple, which developed into scabs which fell off after one week, and that these injuries caused the victim difficulty eating, sleeping, and speaking (People v. Guidice, 83 N.Y.2d 630, 636, 612 N.Y.S.2d 350, 634 N.E.2d 951; People v. Pope, 174 A.D.2d 319, 321, 571 N.Y.S.2d 205, lv. denied 78 N.Y.2d 1079, 577 N.Y.S.2d 243, 583 N.E.2d 955).
Defendant's speedy trial motion was properly denied. With respect to the period of July 11th to August 10, 1994, the July 11th minutes indicate that the arraignment court adjourned the matter to August 10th for motion practice and not merely to transfer the case to another court part (compare, People v. Sai, 223 A.D.2d 439, 637 N.Y.S.2d 56, with People v. Collins, 82 N.Y.2d 177, 181, 604 N.Y.S.2d 11, 624 N.E.2d 139). The period of August 31 to September 21, 1994 was excludable since the prosecution is entitled to a reasonable period of time to respond to defense motions (People v. Reid, 214 A.D.2d 396, 625 N.Y.S.2d 171), and the entire period that a defendant's pretrial motion and the People's response are before the court is excludable as part of motion practice (CPL 30.30[4][a] ). The period from September 21 to October 11, 1994 was properly excluded as a reasonable time to prepare for hearings (People v. Green, 90 A.D.2d 705, 455 N.Y.S.2d 368, lv. denied 58 N.Y.2d 784, 459 N.Y.S.2d 1038, 445 N.E.2d 226).
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: March 10, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)