Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Application of RAS SECURITIES CORP., et al., Petitioners-Appellants, Re the Arbitration commenced by Esther Williams, Respondent-Respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Colleen McMahon, J.), entered October 21, 1997, which denied petitioners' motion to vacate a arbitral award of attorneys' fees in the amount of $159,000 and which granted respondent's cross motion for sanctions in the form of $8,400 in attorneys' fees, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Having participated in the arbitration proceeding for over two years, petitioners' judicial claim that the arbitrators lacked the authority to award attorneys' fees has been waived (see, Rochester City School Dist. v. Rochester Teachers Assn., 41 N.Y.2d 578, 583, 394 N.Y.S.2d 179, 362 N.E.2d 977; Matter of Dember Constr., New York University, 190 A.D.2d 537, 593 N.Y.S.2d 212), and, in any case, the arbitrability of the fees was itself an issue for the arbitrators to decide, as set forth in the parties' arbitration agreement (see, Matter of Smith Barney Shearson Inc. v. Sacharow, 91 N.Y.2d 39, 46, 666 N.Y.S.2d 990, 689 N.E.2d 884).
The parties explicitly agreed in their Uniform Submission Agreements to submit attorneys' fees to arbitration, and the arbitrators were thus empowered to award such fees pursuant to that contractual provision, regardless of whether there was a cognizable basis for such an award in a judicial forum.
The motion court properly imposed sanctions upon petitioners for bringing a frivolous action, in which they also failed to disclose certain information and made various misrepresentations to the court.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 11, 1998
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)