Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Joanne C. JOHNSON, Respondent, v. EXXON CORPORATION, Fisher Scientific Company, Mobil Oil Corporation, Union Carbide Corporation and Union Oil Company of America, Appellants.
Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for injuries she sustained at work due to exposure to chemicals. Supreme Court properly denied defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint as time-barred by CPLR 214-c(2). Defendants failed to establish that plaintiff's cause of action accrued prior to July 21, 1989. Since early 1987, plaintiff experienced occasional ailments from working with chemicals, but she was always able to return to work after those incidents (see, O'Halloran v. 345 Park Co., 251 A.D.2d 260, 675 N.Y.S.2d 55, lv. dismissed 92 N.Y.2d 1026). Plaintiff did not discover “the primary condition on which [her] claim is based” (Matter of New York County DES Litig., 89 N.Y.2d 506, 509, 655 N.Y.S.2d 862, 678 N.E.2d 474) until November 17, 1989, when she was overcome by fumes while working and suffered body tremors, a feeling of intoxication, a shooting pain in her head, rashes on her face and neck, and nausea. Plaintiff was unable to return to work after that incident because any exposure to chemicals would result in a severe reaction. In addition, plaintiff could no longer tolerate the scent of perfumes and tobacco smoke. Plaintiff's symptoms prior to November 1989 were “too isolated or inconsequential to trigger the running of the Statute of Limitations under CPLR 214-c(2)” (Matter of New York County DES Litig., supra, at 514, n. 4, 655 N.Y.S.2d 862, 678 N.E.2d 474).
Order unanimously affirmed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 10, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)