Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
James FIELDS, et al., Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. The SEAVEY ORGANIZATION INC., etc., et al., Defendants-Appellants, Todd W. Jones, et al., Defendants.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Jerry Crispino, J.), entered May 7, 1998, which, in an action by a laborer for personal injuries sustained at a construction site, insofar as appealed from, denied defendants-appellants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them without prejudice to renewal upon completion of disclosure, unanimously modified, on the law, to grant the motion insofar as made on behalf of the individual appellant and the complaint dismissed as against her, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendant-appellant Mariateresa DiGiallonardo dismissing the complaint as against her.
With respect to the individual appellant, plaintiffs' only evidence purporting to bear upon her relationship to the site is a mortgage instrument she signed as president of the corporate owner of the site, corroborating her affidavit that she never acted in a personal capacity with respect to the site (see, Trenga Realty v. Tiseo, 117 A.D.2d 951, 499 N.Y.S.2d 262). However, with respect to the corporate appellant, plaintiffs' documentation indicates that said appellant's officer and director is also the manager and organizer of the defendant builder/developer of the site, and that the two corporations share the same address. This raises an issue of fact as to the relationship between the two corporations. Plaintiffs should be given an opportunity to explore such relationship in discovery.
MEMORANDUM DECISION.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 25, 1999
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)