Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
EPISCOPAL CHURCH HOME OF WESTERN NEW YORK, INC., Plaintiff-Respondent, v. The BULB MAN, INC., Defendant-Appellant.
Plaintiff commenced this action alleging, inter alia, that defendant breached the implied warranty of merchantability by selling plaintiff defective ballasts for light fixtures. The implied warranty of merchantability provides that goods will be fit for the ordinary purposes for which they are used (see, UCC 2-314[2][c]; Gordon v. Ford Motor Co., 260 A.D.2d 164, 165, 687 N.Y.S.2d 369; Butler v. Interlake Corp., 244 A.D.2d 913, 915, 665 N.Y.S.2d 192). Supreme Court properly determined, following a bench trial, that defendant breached that warranty. Plaintiff established that, according to defendant, the accepted failure rate for the fixtures was 10%. Plaintiff presented proof that at least 15% of the fixtures purchased were defective, thereby establishing that the goods were not fit for the ordinary purposes for which they are used (see, UCC 2-314[2][c] ).
We agree with defendant, however, that the court erred in awarding plaintiff damages in the amount of $17,758. In determining the amount of damages, the court failed to comply with UCC 2-714(2), which sets forth the formula for calculating damages in a breach of warranty action “unless special circumstances show proximate damages of a different amount.” Plaintiff failed to prove special circumstances. Defendant concedes that, based upon that formula, plaintiff is entitled to recover damages in the amount of $9,910, and thus we modify the judgment accordingly.
Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs.
MEMORANDUM:
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: July 07, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)