Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Ping LEE, Appellant, v. Peter LIN et al., Respondents.
Order unanimously affirmed with $10 costs.
The court's determination, denying plaintiff's motion to punish defendants for contempt, constituted a proper exercise of its discretion (see, 6 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N.Y. Civ. Prac. ¶ 3126.06). Contempt is not a sanction listed in CPLR 3126 for a party's failure to comply with disclosure. While said section does allow the court to impose, in addition to the sanctions set forth therein, any sanctions “as are just”, the commentary following said section indicates that contempt is only in rare instances imposed against a party (see, Siegel, Practice Commentaries, McKinney's Cons. Laws of N.Y., Book 7B, CPLR C3126:4, at 754-756; see also, 6 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N.Y. Civ. Prac. ¶ 3126.06).
MEMORANDUM.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: June 05, 2000
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Term, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)