Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Pedro LOPERENA, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Faude BUONA, et al., Defendants-Appellants, S & R Medallion Corp., Defendant.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Alan Saks, J.), entered May 28, 2002, which, in an action for personal injuries sustained in a hit-and-run accident involving a taxicab owned and operated by defendants, granted plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment as to liability, and order, same court and Justice, entered January 14, 2003, which, insofar as appealable, denied defendants' motion to renew, unanimously affirmed, with one bill of costs.
Plaintiff made a prima facie showing of entitlement to partial summary judgment as to liability by way of his pleadings and affidavit describing the time, place and hit-and-run circumstances of the accident, the police accident report showing the license plate number of the vehicle that struck him and confirming the time and place of the accident, and the record of the individual defendant's plea of guilty to the crime of leaving the scene of an accident. In opposition, defendants simply presented an affirmation from counsel that did not dispute liability. Defendants' motion to renew was properly denied since it failed to adduce a reasonable justification for this failure to adduce evidence in opposition (CPLR 2221[e][3] ). In any event, defendant driver's affidavit in support of renewal that he was not driving the subject taxicab when plaintiff was struck and had no knowledge of the incident, fails to explain his plea of guilty to leaving the scene of an accident, and is otherwise insufficient to raise a bona fide issue of fact as to liability.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: October 14, 2003
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)