Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Marie CASTRO, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, etc., et al., Respondents.
Decision by the Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance, dated June 12, 2007, which, after a fair hearing, upheld the determination of respondent New York City Department of Social Services (DSS) to discontinue public assistance benefits for petitioner's failure to appear at a mandatory appointment for evaluation of work activity, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied, and this Article 78 proceeding (transferred to this Court by order of Supreme Court, New York County [Jane S. Solomon, J.], entered October 1, 2007), dismissed, without costs.
There was substantial evidence to support the determination that petitioner's failure to comply with the employment requirement for public assistance by missing a mandatory work activity evaluation appointment was willful and without good cause (see Matter of Tessler v. Hammons, 251 A.D.2d 63, 674 N.Y.S.2d 299 [1998] ). The record reveals that petitioner received notice of her appointment (see Matter of Bonilla v. New York State Dept. of Social Servs., 219 A.D.2d 526, 631 N.Y.S.2d 674 [1995], lv. denied 87 N.Y.2d 807, 641 N.Y.S.2d 829, 664 N.E.2d 895 [1996] ), but failed to appear due to a conflict with an internship she had started two weeks earlier. That job, which demanded only 12 hours of her work per week, had been secured on her own, without approval by DSS. She never notified DSS of any conflict with her appointment, even though the notice of her meeting offered her that opportunity.
We have considered petitioner's remaining contentions and find them unavailing.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: January 08, 2009
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)