Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v. Ernst DESTINE, Defendant.
The People's motion for an order, pursuant to CPL § 160.50, granting the People equal access to the unsealed records and transcript in the case, People v. Carlito Thomas, Docket 7805/99, is denied.
Once records have been sealed, the statute affords only narrow grounds for unsealing. CPL § 160.50(1)(d) states in pertinent part:
Record shall be made available to the person accused or to such person's designated agent and shall be made available to ․(ii) a law enforcement agency upon ex parte motion in any superior court; if such agency demonstrates to the satisfaction of the court that such records be made available to it [emphasis added].
The instant motion is not before a Superior Court and there is no jurisdiction under the aforementioned statute to grant the relief requested.
Moreover, under this statute, a law enforcement agency has to demonstrate to the court that “justice requires that such records be made available to it.” The People contend that defense counsel may use the minutes of the Thomas trial to cross-examine the People's witness, and that by permitting its use, Mr. Thomas has made said records public. The court disagrees with this reasoning. CPL § 160.50 permits the accused to grant a designated agent access to his sealed records; in this case, defense counsel only. Mr. Thomas' sealed record does not become public record merely be reciting some of its contents at trial. Thus, the People have not satisfactorily demonstrated that the interests of justice require the unsealing of Mr. Thomas' records.
Notwithstanding this court's denial of the instant motion, if the defendant uses any portion of the testimony of a witness, who testified at the trial of Docket 7805/99, defendant will be required to turn over to the People the entire transcript of that witness' testimony. Additionally, in the discretion of the Trial Judge, defendant may be required to turn over to the People any items contained in the sealed file which was put in issue by that witness' testimony.
JOHN G. MARKS, J.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: February 08, 2001
Court: District Court, Nassau County, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)