MURLAR EQUITIES PARTNERSHIP v. JIMINEZ (2019)

Court of Appeals of New York.

MURLAR EQUITIES PARTNERSHIP, Appellant, v. Franklin JIMINEZ, Respondent, et al., Defendants.

Motion No.: 2019-124

Decided: September 05, 2019

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the May 2018 Appellate Division order, dismissed upon the ground that it does not lie, appellant having previously moved for leave to appeal to this Court (see 32 N.Y.3d 1142, 92 N.Y.S.3d 180, 116 N.E.3d 664 [2019]) from the same Appellate Division order from which leave to appeal is currently sought (see Selinger v. Selinger, 90 N.Y.2d 842, 660 N.Y.S.2d 709, 683 N.E.2d 331 [1997]); motion, insofar as treated as seeking leave to appeal from the July 2018 Supreme Court “judgment/order,” denied.

Cross motion for the imposition of sanctions denied.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network