PEOPLE v. PANTON (2016)

Court of Appeals of New York.

The PEOPLE & c., Respondent, v. Nadine PANTON, Appellant.

Decided: June 30, 2016

Robin Nichinsky, for appellant. David P. Stromes, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Defendant contends that police engaged in improper pre-Miranda custodial interrogation and as a result, her post-Miranda written and video statements should have been suppressed. Because defendant did not raise this particular ground in either her suppression motion or at the hearing, it is unpreserved for our review (see People v. Gonzalez, 55 N.Y.2d 887, 888 [1982] ).

We have considered defendant's remaining contention and find it to be without merit.

Order affirmed, in a memorandum.

Chief Judge DiFIORE and Judges PIGOTT, RIVERA, ABDUS–SALAAM, STEIN, FAHEY and GARCIA concur.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network