Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: BETHELITE COMMUNITY CHURCH, Great Tomorrows Elementary School, Respondent, v. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION OF the CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Appellants.
OPINION OF THE COURT
MEMORANDUM.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with this memorandum.
Petitioner is a religious corporation that operates a church and school in a building it occupies in Manhattan. Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking to annul the determination of the Department of Environmental Protection of the City of New York denying it a full exemption from water and sewer charges under chapter 696 of the New York Laws of 1887, as amended by chapter 893 of the Laws of 1980, and section 24-514(e) of the Administrative Code of the City of New York, respectively.
Respondents do not now dispute the denial of their preanswer motion to dismiss the proceeding. They only challenge that Supreme Court proceeded to the merits without permitting them to submit an answer. Supreme Court erred in granting the petition without first affording respondents an opportunity to answer (see CLPR 7804[f]; Matter of Nassau BOCES Cent. Council of Teachers v. Board of Coop. Educ. Servs. of Nassau County, 63 N.Y.2d 100, 102-104, 480 N.Y.S.2d 190, 469 N.E.2d 511 [1984] ). Accordingly, this case must be remitted to Supreme Court to allow respondents to submit an answer and for further proceedings on the pleadings.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, etc.
Chief Judge KAYE and Judges CIPARICK, GRAFFEO, READ, SMITH, PIGOTT and JONES concur in memorandum.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Decided: June 07, 2007
Court: Court of Appeals of New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)