ALBERT v. SOLIMON (1999)

Court of Appeals of New York.

Crystal ALBERT, Appellant, v. Ezzat M. SOLIMON, Respondent.

Decided: October 14, 1999

Nira T. Kermisch, Rochester, for appellant. Brown & Tarantino, L.L.P., Rochester (Ann M. Campbell of counsel), for respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, without costs. We agree with Supreme Court and the Appellate Division that the examination room of the medical office of the orthopedic surgeon, into which plaintiff brought her service dog, was not a “public facility” within the meaning of Civil Rights Law § 47. No other issue is before us.

Concur: Chief Judge KAYE and Judges BELLACOSA, SMITH, LEVINE, WESLEY and ROSENBLATT. Taking no part: Judge CIPARICK.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network