Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
CLARK COUNTY, POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, Petitioner, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK AND THE HONORABLE TIERRA JONES, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, 180 LAND COMPANY, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; SEVENTY ACRES, LLCA NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY; CITY OF LAS VEGAS, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF NEVADA; AND FORE STARS, LTD., Real Parties in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION
This original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges a district court order denying petitioner's motion to dismiss and granting real parties in interest's countermotion for partial summary judgment in an inverse condemnation case.
Having considered the petition and supporting documentation, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. See Pan v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observing that the party seeking writ relief bears the burden of showing such relief is warranted); Smith v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991) (recognizing that writ relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in determining whether to entertain a writ petition). Petitioner has failed to show that an appeal would not provide an adequate legal remedy, particularly because it appears that little is left to be resolved in the district court and the issues presented could be raised on appeal from a final judgment. See Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841 (recognizing that an appeal from a final judgment is generally an adequate remedy precluding writ relief). Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.
Herndon, C.J.
Bell, J.
Stiglich, J.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 92565
Decided: August 17, 2026
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Make It a Preferred Google Search Source
Add to GoogleGet help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)