Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: DISCIPLINE OF BRIAN J. SMITH, BAR NO. 11279
ORDER IMPOSING TEMPORARY SUSPENSION AND REFERRING ATTORNEY TO DISCIPLINARY BOARD
Bar counsel has filed a petition under SCR 111(4) informing this court that attorney Brian J. Smith has been convicted of reckless driving causing substantial bodily harm, a felony under NRS 484B.653(9), and driving under the influence, a misdemeanor under NRS 484C.400(1). Smith self-reported the convictions as required by SCR 111(2).
When a petition filed under SCR 111(4) establishes that an attorney has been convicted of a “serious crime,” this court is required to suspend the attorney pending a disciplinary proceeding and refer the attorney to the appropriate disciplinary board.1 SCR 111(7) (“Upon the filing with the supreme court of a petition with a certified copy of proof of the conviction, demonstrating that an attorney has been convicted of a serious crime, the court shall enter an order suspending the attorney ․ pending final disposition of a disciplinary proceeding ․”); SCR 111(8) (“Upon receipt of a petition filed under subsection 4 of this rule, demonstrating that an attorney has been convicted of a serious crime, the supreme court shall, in addition to suspending the attorney in accordance with the provisions of subsection 7 of this rule, refer the matter to the appropriate disciplinary board ․”). Under SCR 111(6), a felony is a “serious crime.” Smith's conviction for reckless driving causing substantial bodily harm—a felony—thus requires a suspension and referral.
Accordingly, we suspend attorney Brian J. Smith from the practice of law in Nevada pending a disciplinary proceeding and refer him to the Southern Nevada Disciplinary Board for a hearing to determine “the extent of the discipline to be imposed.” SCR 111(8).
It is so ORDERED.2
Stiglich, C.J.
Lee, J.
Bell, J.
FOOTNOTES
1. For purposes of SCR 111, a “conviction” includes a guilty plea “regardless of ․ whether a final judgment of conviction has been entered.” SCR 111(1).
2. This order constitutes our final disposition of this matter. Any further proceedings involving Smith shall be docketed as a new matter.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 86497
Decided: June 16, 2023
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)