Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
MIGUEL ANGEL LOPEZ, A/K/A MIGUEL ANGEL BELTRAN LOPEZ, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Monica Trujillo, Judge.
The judgement of conviction was filed July 14, 2022, but appellant's notice of appeal was not filed until September 15, 2022, well after the expiration of the 30-day appeal period prescribed by NRAP 4(b). This court issued an order to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Appellant filed a response and a motion for an expedited ruling on the order to show cause, and respondent has filed a reply to the response to order to show cause.
Appellant notes that the judgment of conviction did not appear on the district court's docket until September 13, 2022. Appellant argues that this date should be considered the date of the “entry” of the judgment of conviction for the purposes of NRAP 4(b)(1)(A). We disagree. NRAP 4(b)(1)(A) states that “the notice of appeal by a defendant or petitioner in a criminal case shall be filed with the district court clerk within 30 days after the entry of the judgment or order being appealed.” NRAP 4(b)(4) states that “[a] judgment or order is entered for purposes of this Rule when it is signed by the judge and filed with the clerk.” There is no dispute that the judgment of conviction was signed by the judge and filed by the clerk of the district court on July 14, 2022. Therefore, appellant's notice of appeal filed on September 15, 2022, is untimely. NRAP 4(b)(1)(A). “[A]n untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court.” Lozada v. State, 110 Nev. 349, 352, 871 P.2d 944, 946 (1994). Accordingly, we conclude that we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal, and we
ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.1
Herndon, C.J.
Lee, J.
Parraguirre, J.
FOOTNOTES
1. Appellant's motion to expedite is denied as moot.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 85387
Decided: May 30, 2023
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)