CHRISTOPHER DOOP v. THE STATE OF NEVADA (2023)

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is an original pro se petition for a writ of certiorari in which petitioner appears to challenge the issuance of remittitur in Docket 86020, among other claims.

Petitioner has not provided this court with any exhibits or documents in support of his petition and necessary for this court's consideration of the petition. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing that petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents “essential to understand[ing] the matters set forth in the petition”). Petitioner bears the burden of showing that extraordinary relief is warranted . See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004). We conclude that petitioner has failed to demonstrate our intervention by extraordinary writ is warranted.

Therefore, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter. See NRAP 21(b). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.¹

Stiglich, C.J.

Cadish, J.

Herndon, J.

FOOTNOTES

1.   On April 12, 2023, this court issued a notice directing petitioner to cure the deficient proof of service upon respondent. Petitioner has failed to do so, thus constituting an additional reason to deny the petition.