Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
AIRBUS HELICOPTERS, S.A.S.; AND AIRBUS HELICOPTERS, INC., Petitioners, v. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK; AND THE HONORABLE MARK R. DENTON, DISTRICT JUDGE, Respondents, MARY RIGGS, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF JONATHAN NEAL UDALL, FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE ESTATE OF JONATHAN NEAL UDALL; PHILIP UDALL AND MARLENE UDALL, AS NEXT OF KIN AND NATURAL PARENTS OF JONATHAN NEAL UDALL, DECEASED; SCOTT BOOTH; BRENDA HALVORSON; GEOFFREY EDLUND; PAPILLON AIRWAYS, INC. D/B/A PAPILLON GRAND CANYON HELIPCOPTERS; XEBEC, LLC; AND LON A. HALVORSON, Real Parties in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION
This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a district court order denying a motion to apply Arizona law, or alternatively French and Texas punitive damages law, in a tort action. Having reviewed the petition, we decline to exercise our discretion to entertain the petition. D.R. Horton, Inc. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 123 Nev. 468, 475, 168 P.3d 731, 737 (2007) (recognizing this court's broad discretion in determining whether to consider a writ petition). Mandamus is an extraordinary remedy and will not issue when petitioners have a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy at law. Pan, v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 88 P.3d 840, 841 (2004). Because petitioners have an adequate remedy at law by way of an appeal, we deny the petition.
It is so ORDERED.
Stiglich, C.J.
Cadish, J.
Herndon, J.
Parraguirre, J.
Pickering, J.
Lee, J.
Bell, J.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 85405
Decided: May 04, 2023
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)