KOELLER NEBEKER CARLSON HALUCK LLP LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY v. KERVIN OSEMWENGIE (2023)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION

This original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges a district court order denying a motion to withdraw as counsel.

Having reviewed the petition and supporting documents, we are not persuaded by the record presented, especially given the current posture of the case below, that cur extraordinary intervention is warranted. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nov. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (explaining that petitioner bears the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991) (stating that this court has sole

discretion in determining if a writ petition will be considered). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.¹

Cadish, J.

Pickering, J.

Bell, J.

FOOTNOTES

1.   In light of this order, petitioner's emergency motion for stay is denied as moot.