MATTHEW TRAVIS HOUSTON v. THE STATE OF NEVADA (2023)

ORDER DENYING PETITION

Pro se petitioner has filed a document entitled “Petition for a writ of mandamus, emergency intervention and interpleading of joinder to A-22-853203-W in Dept. 17 (originally filed in Department XI) in re motion to retax as a motion for rehearing under NRAP 40 and NRAP 27(e).”

The petition contains no discernable request for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(3) (explaining that a petition must state, among other things, the relief sought, the issues presented, the facts necessary to understand the issues presented, and the reasons why writ relief should issue); see also NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing that it is petitioner's responsibility to provide this court with all documents essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition). Accordingly, we are unable to proceed with consideration of the petition, and we thus

ORDER the petition DENIED.

Stiglich, C.J.

Cadish, J.

Herndon, J.