MATADAMAS SERRANO v. CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER OFFICE (2022)

Supreme Court of Nevada.

Ruben MATADAMAS-SERRANO, Petitioner, v. CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE, Respondent.

No. 84988

Decided: August 04, 2022

Ruben Matadamas-Serrano Clark County Public Defender

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

This original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a district court order denying petitioners motion to dismiss counsel. Petitioner has failed to include with his petition necessary documentation supporting his request for relief. NRAP 21(a)(4) (petitioner must provide all documents essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition); NRAP 21(c) (petitions for extraordinary writs shall to the extent practicable conform to NRAP 21(a)). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law