Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Warren HAVENS, Appellant, v. Arnold LEONG; and Cheryl Choy, Respondents.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
Preliminary review of the notice and documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, appellant appeals from the district court's minute order. The district court's minute order is not effective and cannot be appealed. State, Div. of Child & Family Servs. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 445, 454, 92 P.3d 1239, 1245 (2004). Accordingly, it appears that this court lacks jurisdiction, and we
ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.1
FOOTNOTES
1. Additionally, in his docketing statement for a related appeal in Docket No. 84309, appellant states in regard to this appeal that the “district court created this appeal. I did not․ It is not a Notice of Appeal.”
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 84471
Decided: May 24, 2022
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)