Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Alberto Torres CARO, Appellant, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
Initial review of the notice of appeal revealed a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, appellant's notice of appeal was untimely. The judgment of conviction was entered December 21, 2021, but appellant's notice of appeal was not filed until January 24, 2022, 4 days after the expiration of the appeal period prescribed by NRAP 4(b). Accordingly, this court directed appellant's counsel to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
In response to the order to show cause, appellant's counsel agrees that this appeal should be dismissed. “[A]n untimely notice of appeal fails to vest jurisdiction in this court.” Lozada v. State, 110 Nev. 349, 352, 871 P.2d 944, 946 (1994). This court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal and
ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 84151
Decided: April 29, 2022
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)