LEIBEL v. STATE (2022)

Supreme Court of Nevada.

Tatiana LEIBEL, Petitioner, v. The STATE of Nevada, Respondent.

No. 84156

Decided: February 17, 2022

Tatiana Leibel Attorney General/Carson City Douglas County District Attorney/Minden

ORDER DENYING PETITION

In this is a pro se original petition for a writ of certiorari, petitioner challenges her incarceration and asserts that she is innocent. Problematically, petitioner failed to provide any judgment of conviction, district court order, lower court record, or other document pertinent to her petition. NRAP 21(a)(4), (c) (explaining that it is the petitioner's obligation to provide an appendix that includes all records that may be essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition). “A writ of certiorari is an extraordinary remedy[,] and the decision to entertain a petition for a writ of certiorari lies within the discretion of this court.” Zamarripa v. First Judicial Dist. Court, 103 Nev. 638, 640, 747 P.2d 1386, 1387 (1987).

Having considered the petition, we conclude that extraordinary relief is not warranted. NRS 34.020 (addressing when writ of certiorari may issue); Zamarripa, 103 Nev. at 640, 747 P.2d at 1387. Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network