Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
SPANISH HEIGHTS ACQUISITION COMPANY, LLC; SJC Ventures Holding Company, LLC, d/b/a SJC Ventures, LLC, Petitioners, v. The EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT of the State of Nevada, IN AND FOR the COUNTY OF CLARK; and the Honorable Joanna Kishner, District Judge, Respondents, CBC Partners I, LLC; CBC Partners, LLC; 5148 Spanish Heights, LLC; Kenneth Antos; and Sheila Neumann-Antos; Dacia, LLC, Real Parties in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION
This original, emergency petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges the district court's January 28, 2022, oral ruling on petitioners’ motion for an injunction to prevent a non-judicial foreclosure sale from proceeding. Petitioners have also filed an emergency motion for stay.
Having considered the petition and supporting documentation, we are not convinced that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev, 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observing that the party seeking writ relief bears the burden of showing such relief is warranted); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 818 P.2d 849, 851 (1991) (recognizing that writ relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in determining whether to entertain a writ petition). In particular, the availability of an appeal is generally an adequate legal remedy precluding writ relief. Pan, 120 Nev. at 224, 88 P.3d at 841; see NRS 34.170; NRS 34.330. Petitioners may appeal from the district court's order denying an injunction, NRAP 3A(b)(3), and we are not persuaded that such an appeal would be an inadequate remedy here. Accordingly, we
ORDER the petition DENIED.1
FOOTNOTES
1. Petitioners have additionally failed to demonstrate that it was impracticable to first seek stay relief in the district court, which is in a better position to determine issues of duration and bond amount, under NRAP 8(a). In light of this order, however, their emergency motion for stay is denied as moot.
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 84149
Decided: February 01, 2022
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
FindLaw for Legal Professionals
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)