Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Lindsey Sharron ANTEE, n/k/a Lindsey Licari, Appellant, v. Bobby Lee ANTEE, a/k/a Bobby Dee Antee, Respondent.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
On May 12, 2021, the clerk of this court issued a notice directing appellant, among other things, to file and serve, by September 9, 2021, either (1) a brief that complies with NRAP 28(a) and NRAP 32 or (2) an informal brief for pro se parties on the form provided by the clerk. The notice cautioned that failure to timely file a brief could result in the dismissal of this appeal. When appellant did not comply, on September 27, 2021, this court entered an order directing appellant, by October 11, 2021, to file and serve either (1) an opening brief that complies with NRAP 28(a) and NRAP 32 or (2) an informal brief for pro se parties on the form provided by the clerk of this court. The order cautioned that failure to comply could result in the dismissal of this appeal as abandoned.
On October 12, 2021, appellant filed a motion requesting, among other things, an extension of time until November 15, 2021, to file the opening brief. The proof of service attached to the motion did not indicate that counsel for respondent was served with the motion. See NRAP 25(b) (“Service on a party represented by counsel shall be made on the party's counsel.”). Therefore, on November 2, 2021, this court entered an order directing appellant, by November 16, 2021, to provide proof of service of the October 12, 2021, motion on counsel for respondent. The order cautioned that if no proof of service was timely received, this court would take no action on the motion. See NRAP 25(d)(3) (stating that this court will not take action on documents filed without proof of service). Appellant did not provide this court with proof of service of the motion on respondent's counsel. Accordingly, this court took no action on appellant's October 12, 2021, motion.
To date, appellant has not filed a brief or an informal brief or further communicated with this court. Accordingly, it appears that appellant has abandoned this appeal, and this court
ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 82887
Decided: February 03, 2022
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)