HOLMES v. MILLER (2022)

Supreme Court of Nevada.

Wilbert Roy HOLMES, Appellant, v. Ernest MILLER; and Capucine Yolanda Holmes, Respondents.

No. 84005

Decided: January 06, 2022

Wilbert Roy Holmes Ernest Miller Heaton Fontano, Ltd.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, appellant fails to identify any appealable order. To the extent appellant wishes to challenge findings from a prove up hearing possibly held December 21, 2021, no written order has been filed. Before a written order is signed and entered by the court, any notice of appeal is prematurely filed and is therefore of no effect. See NRAP 4(a)(1); Rust v. Clark Cty. School District, 103 Nev. 686, 747 P.2d 1380 (1987) (explaining that the district court's oral pronouncement from the bench, the clerk's minute order, and even an unfiled written order cannot be appealed). This court lacks jurisdiction and

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network