ACCOMANDO v. ACCOMANDO (2021)

Supreme Court of Nevada.

Mario ACCOMANDO, Appellant, v. Georgann Rose ACCOMANDO, Respondent.

No. 83716

Decided: December 13, 2021

Mario Accomando Reza Athari & Associates, PLLC.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Review of the notice of appeal and other documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. The challenged order is not appealable. See Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this court “may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule”); see generally In re Temporary Custody of Five Minor Children, 105 Nev. 441, 777 P.2d 901 (1989) (stating that no appeal may be taken from a temporary order subject to periodic mandatory review). Accordingly, this court

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network