Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Sandra CAMACHO, Individually; and Anthony Camacho, Individually, Petitioners, v. The EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT of the State of Nevada, IN AND FOR the COUNTY OF CLARK; and the Honorable Nadia Krall, District Judge, Respondents,
Philip Morris USA, Inc., A Foreign Corporation; RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company, a Foreign Corporation, Individually, and as successor-by-merger to Lorillard Tobacco Company and as successor-in-interest to the United States tobacco business of Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, which is the successor-by-merger to the American Tobacco Company; Liggett Group, LLC, a Foreign Corporation; and ASM Nationwide Corporation, d/b/a Silverado Smokes & Cigars, a Domestic Corporation, Real Parties in Interest. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, a Foreign Corporation, Individually, and as successor-by-merger to Lorillard Tobacco Company And as successor-in-interest to the United States tobacco business of Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation, which is the successor-by-merger to the American Tobacco Company, Petitioner, v. The Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada, in and for the County of Clark; and the Honorable Nadia Krall, District Judge, Respondents, Sandra Camacho, Individually; Anthony Camacho, Individually; Philip Morris USA, Inc., a Foreign Corporation; Liggett Group, LLC, a foreign corporation; and ASM Nationwide Corporation, D/B/A Silverado Smokes & Cigars, a Domestic Corporation, Real Parties in Interest.
ORDER
Cause appearing, and despite real party in interest, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company's opposition, petitioners’ motion for a voluntary dismissal of the petition in Docket No. 82654 is granted. The petition is dismissed. NRAP 42(b). The parties to bear their own attorney fees and costs.
R.J. Reynolds’ motions to consolidate these matters are denied as moot.
It is so ORDERED.
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: No. 82654, No. 83724
Decided: November 19, 2021
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)