FAGEL v. Daria Harper, an Individual; and Daniel Wininger, an Individual, Real Parties in Interest. (2021)

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This original petition for a writ of prohibition challenges a district court order denying, without an evidentiary hearing, a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Having considered the petition and its supporting documentation, we are not persuaded on this record that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted at this time. See Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (observing that the party seeking writ relief bears the burden of showing such relief is warranted); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991) (recognizing that writ relief is an extraordinary remedy and that this court has sole discretion in determining whether to entertain a writ petition). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.¹

FOOTNOTES

1.   The Honorable Mark Gibbons, Senior Justice, participated in the decision of this matter under a general order of assignment.