VIDAL v. The State of Nevada, Real Party in Interest. (2021)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF

This original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus, certiorari, error and/or prohibition appears to seek a writ directing the district court to allow him to file an untimely notice of appeal from a district court order denying a postconviction petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents “essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition”). Therefore, without deciding the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter, see NRAP 21(b); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (“Petitioner[ ] carr[ies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted.”). Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.