Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
SPANISH HEIGHTS ACQUISITION COMPANY, LLC; and SJC Ventures Holding Company, LLC d/b/a SJC Ventures, LLC, Petitioners, v. The Honorable Elizabeth GONZALEZ, District Judge; and the Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada, in and for the County of Clark, Respondents, CBC Partners I, LLC; 5148 Spanish Heights, LLC; Kenneth Antos; and Sheila Neumann-Antos, Real Parties in Interest.
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION
This original petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition challenges a district court order appointing a receiver and the court's refusal to grant injunction relief.
An appeal is generally an adequate legal remedy precluding writ relief Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 224, 88 P.3d 840, 841 (2004); see NRS 34.170; NRS 34.330. Since an order appointing a receiver is appealable under NRAP 3A(b)(4) and an order denying an injunction is appealable under NRAP 3A(b)(3), petitioners have an adequate legal remedy in the form of an appeal from the district court's orders. See NRAP 4(a)(1) (stating that the notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days from the date when written notice of entry of the order appealed from is served). Indeed, it appears that petitioners have appealed from the challenged orders, see Spanish Heights Acquisition Co., LLC v. CBC Partners I, LLC, Docket Nos. 82868 & 83407, and petitioners have not argued or demonstrated that our extraordinary intervention is nevertheless warranted to review these orders. Thus, we decline to consider this petition for extraordinary writ relief, NRAP 21(b); Smith v. Eighth. Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 818 P.2d 849 (1991), and we
ORDER the petition DENIED.1
FOOTNOTES
1. In light of this order, petitioners’ emergency motion for stay, as well as real parties in interest's motion to extend the deadline to respond to the stay motion past the requested relief date, are denied as moot.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 83526
Decided: September 30, 2021
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)