SAGA v. HAKOPYAN (2021)

Supreme Court of Nevada.

Richard SAGA, an Individual; Sophie Ideker, an Individual; Mark Miyaoka, an Individual; and Robert Tanko, Individual, Appellants, v. Garnik HAKOPYAN, an Individual, Respondent.

No. 82570

Decided: July 14, 2021

The Law Offices of Curtiss S. Chamberlain Wiley Petersen

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is an appeal from a district court order denying a motion to set aside a default judgment. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Timothy C. Williams, Judge.

When our preliminary review of the docketing statement and the NRAP 3(g) documents revealed a potential jurisdictional defect, we directed appellants to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Specifically, it appears the notice of appeal is untimely from the only appealable order. See NRAP 4(a)(1); NRAP 26(c); NRAP4 (a)(4)(C). The order to show cause cautioned appellants that failure to demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction may result in the dismissal of this appeal. Appellants’ response was due to be filed on or before May 27, 2021.

To date, appellants have failed to respond to the order to show cause or to otherwise demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Accordingly, it appears we lack jurisdiction, and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network