THOMAS v. WARD (2021)

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Review of the notice of appeal and documents before this court reveals a jurisdictional defect. The challenged order regarding fees and costs does not appear to be substantively appealable. NRAP 3A(b)(8) permits an appeal from a special order after final judgment, which is an order that affects the rights of any party growing out of the final judgment. Gumm v. Mainor, 118 Nev. 912, 59 P.3d 1220 (2002). Here, the challenged order awards fees and costs related to appellant's filing of a motion for order to show cause, and does not affect the rights of the parties arising from the final judgment regarding custody. Thus, the order is not appealable as a special order after final judgment, and no other statute or court rule appears to authorize an appeal from this order. See Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this court “may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule”). This court lacks jurisdiction and

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.