HAYES v. The State of Nevada, Real Party in Interest. (2020)

Supreme Court of Nevada.

James Howard HAYES, Jr., Petitioner, v. The EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT of the State of Nevada, in and for the County of Clark, Respondent, The State of Nevada, Real Party in Interest.

No. 82202

Decided: December 24, 2020

Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR PROHIBITION

This original, pro se petition for a writ of mandamus or prohibition seeks to compel the district court to resolve petitioner's pending amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus and motion to vacate sentence.

Having considered the petition and supporting documents, we are not persuaded that our extraordinary and discretionary intervention is warranted at this time. Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004); Smith v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 107 Nev. 674, 677, 679, 818 P.2d 849, 851, 853 (1991). We anticipate that the district court will rule on these filings as promptly as its docket and the current pandemic-related circumstances allow. Accordingly, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network