HUNDLEY v. The State of Nevada, Real Party in Interest. (2020)

Supreme Court of Nevada.

Jamee Deirdre HUNDLEY, a/k/a James Derrick Hundley, Petitioner, v. The SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT of the State of Nevada, IN AND FOR the COUNTY OF WASHOE; and the Honorable Kathleen M. Drakulich, District Judge, Respondents, The State of Nevada, Real Party in Interest.

No. 82069

Decided: December 01, 2020

Jamee Deirdre Hundley Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

This original pro se petition for a writ of mandamus seeks a writ directing the district court to resentence petitioner because her sentence was based on a materially untrue foundation.

We have reviewed the documents submitted in this matter and, without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised therein, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction. See NRS 34.160; NRAP 21(b)(1); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228, 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) (“Petitioner[ ] carr[ies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted.”).

Accordingly, without deciding upon the merits of any claims raised, we

ORDER the petition DENIED.¹

FOOTNOTES

1. Good cause appearing, we grant petitioner's motion to proceed under her legal name and be recognized in the feminine.

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network