Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Margaret Mary MAHON, a/k/a Meg Mahon; and Christopher John Lund, Appellants, v. EDGEWOOD MHP PARTNERS, LLC, a Limited Liability Company, Derivatively by Property Buyers, LLC, Respondents.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
On July 10, 2020, this court entered an order striking the opening brief.1 This court directed appellants to file and serve either (1) an informal brief for pro se parties on the form provided by the clerk of this court or (2) an opening brief that was signed by both appellants, complied with the requirements of NRAP 28 and NRAP 32, and contained a certificate of service and a certificate of compliance. Appellants were cautioned that failure to comply could result in the dismissal of this appeal.
On July 20, 2020, appellants resubmitted their opening brief. However, the clerk of this court issued a notice rejecting that brief because it did not comply with this court's rules.2 The notice directed appellants to correct the deficiencies and resubmit their opening brief within 5 days. Appellants did not comply or otherwise communicate with this court. Accordingly, on August 25, 2020, this court entered an order directing appellants to file and serve, by September 1, 2020, either (1) an informal brief on the form provided by the clerk of this court or (2) an opening brief that complies with NRAP 28 and NRAP 32.3 This court cautioned that failure to comply could result in the dismissal of this appeal as abandoned.
Appellants did not comply or otherwise communicate with this court. Thus, on September 17, 2020, this court entered an order directing appellants to file and serve, within 7 days, either (1) an informal brief on the form provided by the clerk of this court or (2) an opening brief that complies with NRAP 28 and NRAP 32,4 This court cautioned that failure to comply could result in the dismissal of this appeal as abandoned.
To date, appellants have not resubmitted an opening brief or otherwise communicated with this court. Accordingly, it appears that appellants have abandoned this appeal, and this court
ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
Attachment
FOOTNOTES
1. A copy of this order is attached.
2. A copy of this notice is attached.
3. A copy of this order is attached.
4. A copy of this order is attached.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 80229
Decided: November 09, 2020
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)