Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Arthur J. BAYER, Jr., Individually; and Arthur J. Bayer, Jr., as Trustee of the Bayer Family Revocable Living Trust, Appellants, v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC, d/b/a Mr. Cooper; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.; and Affinia Default Service, LLC, Respondents.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is an appeal from a district court order denying an application for default. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Kathleen M. Drakulich, Judge.
Respondent Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The motion is joined by respondent Affinia Default Service, LLC. Nationstar asserts that the challenged order is not appealable as a final judgment under NRAP 3A(b)(1). Appellants oppose the motion, arguing that the order is final as to the dismissal of Wells Fargo Bank.1 Nationstar has replied.
This court “may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule.” Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013). The challenged order is not appealable as a final judgment under NRAP 3A(b)(1) because it does not finally resolve all claims as to all parties in the underlying district court action. See Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 426, 996 P.2d 416, 417 (2000) (defining a final judgment). FMR 24 does not authorize an appeal from an interlocutory order such as the one challenged here. To the extent appellants contend that the appeal is authorized by FMR 12 or NRCP 19, this contention lacks merit.
As no statute or court authorizes this appeal from the challenged order, this court lacks jurisdiction. The motion to dismiss is granted, and this court
ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
FOOTNOTES
1. Appellants also argue that Nationstar lacks authority to file a motion to dismiss this appeal. As a respondent to this appeal, Nationstar may properly file a motion to dismiss.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: No. 81479
Decided: August 14, 2020
Court: Supreme Court of Nevada.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)